[tps_header][/tps_header]
Flight 2
@NewMarketMauler @johncaveosborne Gurley Gets Probed, Mizzou Gets a Chubb — The Vol Colonel (@TheVOLColonel) October 10, 2014
Very nice, Colonel. My Mizzou-themed headline was: Without Gurley, Pinkel Prepares For Encounter With Chubb. Because if you take Gurley out of the equation, it only stands to reason you’re left with Pinkel and Chubb going at it. Next up:
@FullyBrad@johncaveosborne@VolRumorMill@FootballTimeMag Chubb has to stay in now. Can’t go in and out. — Seth Stokes (@SethStokesTSE) October 10, 2014
I see what you did there, Seth. And I approve.
@johncaveosborne @Travis_Cabage pressure in the backfield does not slow Chubb down — Seth Stokes (@SethStokesTSE) October 10, 2014
That wouldn’t be pressure from the A gap, would it, Seth?
Gurley excited Chubb can get it done. @johncaveosborne — Volstorm (@volstorm00) October 10, 2014
Who isn’t? Next:
@johncaveosborne From yesterday: Gators to load D line and force Chubb in the box. — BigOrangeButch (@BigOrangeButch) October 10, 2014
Putting Chubb in the same sentence as box is evidence of superior deductive reasoning.
@johncaveosborne UGa backfield still loaded with Chubb despite losing Gurley — Lone Nut (@LoneNutVolFan) October 10, 2014
It’s true. Gurley may have had some serious junk in the trunk, but there’s more where that came from in that backfield. [tps_footer][/tps_footer]
